Claim Vitiation Limitation to the Doctrine of Equivalents May Be Diminishing

June 25, 2013

6/25/2013 - Claim Vitiation Limitation to the Doctrine of Equivalents May Be Diminishing -- The Fed. Circuit recently interpreted claim vitiation to be “an acknowledgement that each element in the claim must be present in the accused device either literally or equivalently.” It is unclear whether claim vitiation is still a separate standard that can be applied as a defense to the doctrine of equivalents. Claim vitiation remains a question of law for a court to decide (i.e., that “no reasonable jury could determine two elements to be equivalents"), whereas the doctrine of equivalents remains a question of fact for a jury to decide. The Intellectual Property Strategist, Vol. 19, No. 8, May 2013 http://www.lawjournalnewsletters.com/issues/ljn_intproperty/19_8/news/The-Diminishing-Claim-Vitiation-Limitation-to-the-Doctrine-of-Equivalents158115-1.html

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

We are pleased to welcome Daniel Keeler to the firm!  

Daniel Keeler Joins KwanIP

September 4, 2018

1/2
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Berkeley Office:

2000 Hearst Avenue, Suite 305

Berkeley, California 94709

Phone: (510) 900-9501
Fax: (408) 228-3739
Email: info@kwanip.com

Copyright © 2011-2019 Kwan & Olynick LLP.  All rights reserved. 

Kwan & Olynick LLP does not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, age, nationality, social or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, marital status, pregnancy, political affiliation, or disability.